Photos from today's events. Love you Papa, we'll miss you!!
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
The Bishop In White
There are definitely things moving in the Church, and as the
time is coming closer for the election of the new Pope, it is becoming quite
interested what is developing. As for many of us, our understanding of Pope
Benedict’s resignation was due to his “advanced age” as he stated and inability
to carry on with the mission that was handed to him to lead the Church. But
recently I came across some new information behind the Holy Father’s reason to
resign, information that I found very intriguing.
According to “These Last Days Ministries” website, Pope
Benedict’s action is something that is unprecedented in the history of the Holy
Roman Catholic Church. On their site they state that “Yes, there were a couple
of other resignations of popes in the past, but the circumstances were totally
different. Never has a pope resigned because he felt too tired and weak to
carry on.” This along with another site that I found bringing attention to the two
lightning strikes onto the dome of St. Peter’s that evening added an mysterious
emphasis that the Pope’s action demanded the world’s attention.
So what is happening? Well… if my research is leading me in
the right direction, this is something really big and revolutionary in the
Church.
According to Robert Moynihan, a reliable, long-time Vatican
observer and Founder of Inside the Vatican magazine, who also finds
himself disturbed about the Pope’s announcement, wrote:
“Are there facts the Pope has weighed in making this
decision that we simply don't know about, or don't know fully? … Does the Pope
have information about the possible course of events in the months ahead that
led him to conclude that he needed to allow a younger, more energetic man to
take over his office from him, so that the Church's highest authority could
take action quickly and decisively as events unfold?”
It is clear to me that the Holy Father’s fatigue has come
about from much more than aging. In reading other commentators online, they
have revealed an aggressive battle going on within the Catholic Church and a
notably rising tide of hatred towards authentic Christianity from
outside. Moreover, a comment from Benedict, adds to the impression that
resignation was decided for strategic reasons. A new pope had to be quickly
chosen because of the pace of alarming events both within and outside the
Church. During his Ash Wednesday homily, Benedict stated:
“I am thinking in particular of the sins against the
unity of the Church, of the divisions in the body of the Church.”
And then we should remember these words from his first Mass
as Pope:
“Pray for me, that I may not flee for fear of the
wolves.”
Is he fleeing from the wolves, especially those within the
Church, who he knew would inevitably, incessantly attack him during his
pontificate? I highly doubt it. They have been even more brutal than he
anticipated in response to his determined rolling back of some of the chaos
that followed Vatican II and his strong rebukes to all the elements of the
Culture of Death. According to Life Site News, they say that “Benedict’s
resignation should instead, be seen as a deeply humbling self-sacrifice to pave
the way for an urgently needed stronger pope and stronger Church.”
Benedict's radical action and sense of urgency for doing so
makes more sense in the light of excerpts from what then Fr. Ratzinger stated
in a series of 1969-70 radios addresses on German and Vatican radio.
These were published in 2009 in the book, Faith and the Future.
“The church will become small and will have to start
afresh more or less from the beginning.
She will no longer be able to inhabit many of the
edifices she built in prosperity. As the number of her adherents diminishes…she
will lose many of her social privileges…. As a small society, [the Church] will
make much bigger demands on the initiative of her individual members…."
"…But when the trial of this sifting is past, a
great power will flow from a more spiritualized and simplified Church. Men in a
totally planned world will find themselves unspeakably lonely. If they have
completely lost sight of God, they will feel the whole horror of their poverty.
Then they will discover the little flock of believers as something wholly new.
They will discover it as a hope that is meant for them, an answer for which
they have always been searching in secret.
And so it seems certain to me that the Church is facing
very hard times. The real crisis has scarcely begun. We will have to count on
terrific upheavals. But I am equally certain about what will remain at the end:
not the Church of the political cult, which is dead already, but the Church of
faith. She may well no longer be the dominant social power to the extent that
she was until recently; but she will enjoy a fresh blossoming and be seen as
man’s home, where he will find life and hope beyond death.”
The Holy Father’s words in these radio excerpts echo to me
the same kind of words that Our Lady of Good Success spoke when talking about
the end times, and the Church’s faithful becoming less and less. This is not
saying that we are loosing members to our Church, no, but I would venture you
to consider how many of our members are all good practicing Catholics who
follow their Catechism to a T? And don’t get me wrong; I am guilty of this too
in my lack of full knowledge of all Church teachings. It is not too far off to
say that we all need a restart in our faith, since our faithful members are
becoming less.
So, something needs to be done. According to Our Lady of
Good Success, we should not be afraid because as she points out, “The Church
will return to her former beauty.” A reset is at hand I believe. And Benedict's
past Sunday Angelus prayers, as reported by Vatican Insider, fit this
same theme. He prayed:
“The time of testing is here. We must not use God for our
own ends.”
Recently in last December 2012, Pope Benedict
promulgated Intima Ecclesiae Natura, a law whose consequences will have a
serious and lasting impact, especially in the United States.
As Christopher Manion of Crisis Magazine reports: “In
the next twenty years, we will witness one of the biggest shifts in Church’s
educational and charitable activities. When Intima Ecclesiae Natura, is
fully implemented, the Church will have to sever its ties with an increasingly
hostile, even hedonistic, secular government, and cease accepting government
funding for its charities, its educational institutions, and its hospitals. The
results will be revolutionary—and liberating.”
“Benedict has set in motion dramatic processes to correct
the abuses and damages and steer all Catholic agencies back onto their correct
path of being part of the evangelizing mission of the Church. Very many have
strayed far from that primary role of Christian charities and in fact, as we
have shown, many Catholic Church-funded groups actively oppose Christian
principles on life, family and other crucial issues.”
Australian Cardinal George Pell's response to the
resignation explains more of why Benedict felt he had to make way for a more
energetic pope to carry on the multifaceted reforms that he began. Pell states,
as reported by CathNews: The new Pope must save the Catholic Church from
waning influence amid the evils of modern society "If we go under, we
surrender to the tides that are breaking up families, decreasing the birth
rate, the challenges of alcoholism and drugs and pornography. If we collapse or
we wobble disastrously, it won't be for the good of the western world at
all," he said.
It is also important to note something else that I forgot to
look at in my research for my article on “Papal Prophecies”. A lot of these
events that are occurring are also surprisingly pointing us to the events that
are described in the Third Secret of Fatima. Yes, Fatima!
In the portion of the Third Secret revealed by the Vatican
in the year 2000, there is a vision of the Holy Father passing “through a big
city half in ruins”, who is then “killed by a group of soldiers who fired
bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the
other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of
different ranks and positions”. Earlier in the same vision, Sister Lucia
also reports seeing one she refers to as “a Bishop dressed in white”. Yet
she did not refer to the Bishop in white as the Holy Father, but only said “we
had the impression that he was the Holy Father”.
This is very interesting why Sister Lucia used the term
“Bishop dressed in white” in the first part of the vision, rather than the name
“Holy Father”, who she later identified as being killed? Does this vision refer
to two different men: one who is the Pope and another who is only dressed like
a pope? Prophecies are usually unclear until they unfold, but recent events may
shed a new light on this curious phrase used by Sister Lucia.
As we know now according to Fr. Georg Ratzinger, the brother
of Pope Benedict XVI, the Holy Father will continue to wear white after he has
resigned, and he will retain his papal name, yet be referred to as His Holiness
Benedict XVI, Bishop Emeritus of Rome. So basically he will be “a Bishop dressed
in white”. Is this the future bishop dressed in white that Sister Lucia
was referring to? If so, is it he who is killed by the group of soldiers,
as shown in the Vision? Or is the Vision perhaps referring to a future
pope – the one Sister Lucia calls “the Holy Father” who is reigning while
Benedict XVI is still alive?
It is interesting to note that Pope St. Pius X also had two
visions that were similar to the Fatima Vision of Sister Lucia. In 1909,
during an audience with members of the Franciscan Order, St. Pius X had a
vision of a future pope fleeing Rome. He said:
"What I have seen is terrifying! Will I be the
one, or will it be a successor? What is certain is that the Pope will leave
Rome and, in leaving the Vatican, he will have to pass over the dead bodies of
his priests!"
Just before he died Pope St. Pius X had another similar
vision, in which he saw a future pope of the same name fleeing over the
bodies of his brethren, before being killed himself.
"I have seen one of my successors, of the same name
who was fleeing over the bodies of his brethren. He will take refuge in some
hiding place; but after a brief respite, he will die a cruel death”.
It will be very interesting if the next pope we see takes
the name Pius XIII - “the same name” as Pius X. All-in-all it is clear
that something big is happening here in the Church. And it is very possible
that we are progressing towards to the events foretold at Fatima. May we
renew our courage and zeal for the Faith, always remembering the words of Our
Lady of Fatima: In the end my Immaculate Heart will triumph.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Reform Your Heart... Not the Church!
In the wake of Pope Benedict’s announcement, you may have
heard many discussing how “they think the Church needs to reform.” Whenever I
hear this I just want to bust out laughing. “Oh please, dear media, celebrities
and pop culture enthusiasts… please tell us how you think the Church that Jesus
Christ founded needs to reform!?” Are you serious? Where do these people come
off thinking that they have this great knowledge of what is right for the
Catholic Church?
One of the first things I often hear is that the Church
needs to change the Sacrament of Holy Orders to allow women to be priests.
According to them, this would help in the Church’s vocation problem and also
show that the Church is “with the times” on the equality of women.
Right off the bat, I can’t believe that this argument still
continues? It’s about as pointless as people demanding that the government
release documentation on alien life! It’s ridiculous! And really a blasphemy to
the Sacrament of Holy Orders!
Let’s get some things straight on this issue. Number one,
it’s not up for debate in the Church, so making this an issue is only creating
excuses aroused by the Devil to have aversion to the Church. If you are someone
who thinks that the Church needs to allow women to be Priests, then you clearly
have no knowledge of what the Sacrament of Holy Orders is all about, nor its
meaning to our salvation. There are many arguments out there that have been
said that truly hold no weight what-so-ever on this topic! And if you believe
any of them, then you have truly been fooled, so let’s clear some things up.
The most common argument is that Jesus never ordained women
because at the time it wouldn’t have been acceptable. This is such an ignorant
statement. We know that historically Jesus did many things that were
unacceptable at that time in history. So many unacceptable things including for
example, even allowing women to be amongst His followers, that it eventually
lead Him to His death. If Jesus wanted women priests in His Church to begin
with, He would have ordained them, and instructed His Apostles to ordain them
and the people of those times would welcome it because Jesus said so. However the
mere fact that He didn’t even ordain His own beloved mother who was the best
woman that ever lived, clearly points out that this was not a matter of social
politics, but actually a matter pertaining to the spirit. Men and women are
created equal in many ways, but we are not the same. We are still created wife
and mother, husband and father. Roles that are not interchangeable. The role of
a man being called to the priesthood is true poetic justice to his fall in the
Garden of Eden. Because man failed to protect his wife in the Garden of Eden,
it has been put upon men this task to now protect the Church who is the Bride
of Christ.
When Christ came into this world, He came as a man. Why?
Because the essence of man as created by God, is to be leader, protector and
father. Jesus showed men how to truly act like men by showing Himself as the
“New Adam.” Since the first Adam failed, Jesus shows us the true way to be, and
therefore through the Sacrament of Holy Orders, man is called to act in Persona Christi, (in the person of
Christ). To protect, lead and father the Church and the children she bares.
This is not a feminine role. Of course Jesus showed us all how to live out our
calling in Baptism to be priest, prophet and king. But this is a different kind
of priesthood than that which is given to us in baptism. For any man, Christ
has given us the example of how to live our lives as true men of God. And the
Sacramental Priesthood is a good fulfillment to that nature as a man.
Besides the spiritual reasons behind why women can’t be
ordained, the Church has made it clear for centuries that this is a dogma of
the Church and cannot be changed. Even Blessed Pope John Paul II made it clear
in his apostolic letter “Ordinatio
sacerdotalis” in
1994 that even if the Church wanted to ordain women, they do not have the power
to do so. He even concluded his letter by speaking from the Chair of Peter and
declaring infallibly that, “Wherefore, in order that all doubt may
be removed regarding a matter of great importance, a matter which pertains to
the Church's divine constitution itself, in virtue of my ministry of confirming
the brethren (cf. Lk 22:32) I declare that the Church has no authority
whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to
be definitively held by all the Church's faithful.” By
the Pope stating “I declare” this is an infallible statement, it therefore
should be understood that this issue is… case closed!
But
what about how it could help vocations in the Church?
This is also a false accusation that is about as equal too Obama’s idea that if
we spend more, our national debt will go away. The answer is no, ordaining
women would not help the vocations problem. It would only hurt Holy Mother
Church and her children. The vocations problem is not caused by not allowing
women to be priests, it’s because currently no one is taking their faith
seriously. Before Vatican II when the seminaries were overflowing with
vocations, the faithful were serious about their faith. Now-a-days when there
are such things as “Clown Masses” and homilies that start out with a joke, the
seriousness of a vocation is lost. What is needed is a return to the reverence
and traditions of the Church, along with a greater understanding of our Catechism.
If you look at parts of the Church that are very traditional and have a
stronger reverence for the Eucharist, there you will find many vocations
growing day by day.
Another thing to mention is that the argument to allow
priests to get married is another idea that truly holds no weight in helping
the Church. Although even St. Peter himself was married and some priests who
are apart of the Eastern Rites of the Church allow their priests to be married,
this does not help vocations. It actually makes the vocation a lot tougher! Ask
any married priest of one of the Eastern Catholic Rites of the Church and they
will tell you that life, as a married Priest is no picnic.
Yet some will also say that allowing priests to get married
would also help the abuse scandals in the Church. False. The abuse scandals
were not caused because the practice of being celibate. The abuse scandals came about because of
temptations and feeling in these men that were never addressed and eventually a
sin was committed. And because of these incidents, the Church is taking action
to better council these men and helps them to fight these impure
temptations. Allowing them to marry is
not a solution. Remember that even Protestant Ministers have had similar
problems in their churches, and many of them are married.
On the issue of allowing even contraception in the Church…
that also will never happen. God said from the beginning, “be fruitful and
multiply,” do you really think that His Church would condone a practice that
would put a stop to life? No. Even Humane Vitae states many of the dangers that
contraception can cause. I think people often view contraception as a necessity
when having a family and wanting to space each child out. Or people might also
think that it is important to give it to your children so that they don’t get
pregnant by “mistake”.
Lets all remember that a baby is not a mistake. If two
people, whether they are married or not, engage in a sexual embrace, there is
likely a chance that they could become pregnant. This is not a new phenomena
people! If you don’t want to have children, then don’t put yourself into that
scenario! And especially, if you are someone who doesn’t want kids… then
marriage really isn’t for you. Marriage by historical definition from the
beginning of time was made for a man and a woman to be joined together to bring
life into this world and raise that life as mother and father. If you are not
ready to be a father or mother, then you are not ready for marriage! And if you
are married and are not open to life, then you might need a reform of your
marriage because you are missing out on one of the greatest gifts that this
sacrament holds. And don’t worry about the number of children God gives you. If
a child is conceived, then they have a purpose and mission set by God to live
out in this life. We must remember that God watches over all of us, and takes
care of us. (Matthew 6:26) Therefore no one should every worry about how they
will support their children because as long as you have faith in God, He will
never give you more than you can handle. I was even told the story once of a
family that was down to their last dime, and the father put that dime into the
collection box at Church. His wife was so angry at him for what he did, but he
knew God would provide for them. And sure enough when they arrived home,
neighbors had left baskets of food on their doorstep. God is good!
You see the Church teaches these things not to be “behind the
times”, but rather they are ahead of the times. The Church knows by the
guidance of the Holy Ghost what is right and what is wrong for the faithful.
Even Jesus preached about how it is wrong to follow the traditions of men (Mark
7:8) instead of the commandments of God. The traditions of the Church are not
that of men, but are the teachings of Jesus Christ handed on down through the
Apostles and Bishops of the Church. It is the Catholic Church herself that is
the only Church that holds steadfast to the truth of God, because the Spirit of
God runs her. Who are we, to tell God to reform His Church? It is those of us
who find quarrel with the Church who rather need a reform of heart so that the
next time we hear one of these fantasy stories about how the Church should be,
we will know it is nothing more than a fantasy.
Friday, February 15, 2013
Papal Prophecies
We have all been shocked by the news of Pope Benedict’s resignation. It really was a decision that came with no warning at all. If you even see the pictures of the Holy Father delivering his message to his fellow cardinals, all around him they seem to also have a look of shock on their faces. Truly our Holy Father is a dear and humble man, and did a great job at even out smarting the media on this one!
It’s very sad to know that our dear Holy Father will be
retiring. He is one of the greatest theologians in the world and has given the
Church so much wonderful and inspiring guidance. His leadership in the Church
will be greatly missed, but now we must look forward and pray for our next
Pope. Who will he be? What is to come in the Church? I learned a long time ago
that we should not worry about what the future may hold, nor involve ourselves
with predictions and prophecies of the end times. We must remember what the
Bible says about how no one knows when the Apocalypse will occur. However, we must
always be ready for the end!
Since the Holy Father’s announcement, many have begun to
talk about the St. Malachy prophecy on the last pope and how Pope Benedict XVI sounds a lot like the second to the last pope
of the prophecy. At the end of the prophecy it states:
In
the extreme persecution of the Holy Roman Church, there will sit ... Peter the
Roman, who will pasture his sheep in many tribulations: and when these things
are finished, the city of seven hills will be destroyed, and the terrible judge
will judge his people. The End.
Cardinal Tarcisio Pietro Evasio Bertone |
Personally, I don’t buy it. The Malachy prophecy of the last popes still sounds a bit sketchy to me, and I wouldn’t place all my eggs in one basket over this one. My guess is that we will all be surprised by the election. For that matter, I’m not fazed by the speculations people are into right now. The Holy Ghost is in charge of this process and will ultimately decide who our next pope will be.
One thing that is interesting to me, and probably a more valid prophecy than all the others is the dream that St. John Bosco had about a future pope who will guide the Catholic Church through a fierce storm of attacks into a respite of calm and peace.
In his dream, Don Bosco saw the Church as a great three-masted ship being moored securely between two towering pillars representing the Holy Eucharist and the Blessed Virgin Mary. As Patrick Madrid stated in his recent online article addressing this topic, “I think many Catholics today would agree that, however choppy the water may be right now, the Catholic Church seems to be headed straight into a dark and dangerous storm of gale proportions.” He goes on to also point out that “Cardinal Francis George recently said as much when he commented prophetically that he expects to die in his bed, he expects his successor to die in prison, and he expects his successor’s successor to die a martyr’s death.”
Lightening strikes the dome of St. Peter's |
There is also talk I have read about the “Worthy Shepherd Prophecy,” attributed to Blessed Tomasuccio de Foligno, which predicted that an Angelic Pope would come and heal the Church of schism and would be elected by "about twelve years shall the millennium have passed":
"One from beyond the mountains shall become the Vicar Of God. Religious and clerics shall take part in this change. Outside the true path, there will be only disreputable men; I shrug my shoulders when the Bark of Peter is in danger and there is no one to lend it help... The schismatic shall fall into the scorn of the Italian faithful... By about twelve years shall the millennium have passed when the resplendent mantle of legitimate power shall emerge from the shadows where it was being kept by the schism. And beyond harm from the one who is blocking the door of salvation, for his deceitful schism shall have come to an end. And the mass of the faithful shall attach itself to the worthy Shepherd, who shall extricate each one from error and restore to the Church its beauty. He shall renew it."
The first known prophecy of the Angelic Pope, or pastor angelicus, was cited by the English polymath Roger Bacon in the 13th century:
...Forty years ago it was prophesied, and there have been many visions to the same effect, that there will be a pope in these times who will purify Canon Law and the Church of God from the sophistries and deceits of the jurists so that justice will reign over all without the rumbling of lawsuits. Because of the goodness, truth, and justice of this pope the Greeks will return to the obedience of the Roman Church, the greater part of the Tartars will be converted to the faith, and the Saracens will be destroyed. There will be one flock and one shepherd, as the prophet heard (John 10:16)...
(Taken from Roger Bacon's The Third Work. Trans. by B McGinn Visions of the End (New York, Columbia, 1998) p190)
The Angelic Pope of medieval prophecy was foretold to heal the schism with the Eastern Othrodox Church (which echoes the conversion of Russia prophesied at Fatima). Later, the pastor angelicus prophecies would also be connected to the reunfication of the schismatic Protestant churches with Rome, as well as the future conversion of England - such as foretold in the original 1846 Church-approved version of the secrets of La Salette:
The faith will die out in France: three quarters of France will not practice religion anymore, or almost no more, the other part will practice it without really practicing it. Then, after [that], nations will convert, the faith will be rekindled everywhere. A great country, now Protestant, in the north of Europe, will be converted; by the support of this country all the other nations of the world will be converted.
Before all that arrives, great disorders will arrive, in the Church, and everywhere. Then, after [that], our Holy Father the Pope will be persecuted. His successor will be a pontiff that nobody expects.
Then, after [that], a great peace will come, but it will not last a long time. A monster will come to disturb it.
This last prediction sounds very familiar to me, in that is correlates with the prophecies of the “Great King” who will come and help the Pope convert the whole world and bring a time of great peace, which will then be over soon when everyone becomes so fat with happiness, that they forget about God. It is then that the Muslims will move in and a battle will break out in which the Great King will be killed, and the Antichrist will arise.
Our Lady of Good Success |
Regardless of anything, there is something happening in the Church I feel. And it is a feeling that gives me hope and a bit of “excited fear”. Whatever is happening, I know is going to be big! Nothing but good things are ahead of us I believe.
Monday, February 11, 2013
Viva Papa Ratzi!
Pope Benedict’s Resignation: My Thoughts
1.
Disappointment and sadness. Pope Benedict is a
wonderful beloved Pope and he will be greatly missed! I feel like he has so
much to still offer, but I respect his decision.
2.
He spoke in his statement that he came to this
decision over much time in prayer. Therefore I must believe that this is also
God’s Will.
3.
I’m not afraid. I trust and believe that since
this is God’s Will only good things will follow.
4.
The Church is ultimately run by the Holy Ghost
and we know that the “gates of Hell will never prevail against it.” Maybe God
is planning to appoint someone who the Church greatly needs right now, a
Pontiff that will help the Church and increase her faith and members. We are
facing some troubling times with atheism and paganism on the rise. Terror at
every corner of the world, and leaders who lead nations with their own selfish
pride. Not that Pope Benedict hasn’t done a great job already, God just might
have someone new in mind that may bring a fresh new insight into things that
will open our hearts to Christ even more.
5.
We must remember that this is not the first Pope
to retire. A number of popes have resigned before, most recently in
1415, when Gregory XII resigned. Even Blessed John Paul II thought about
resigning repeatedly but didn’t, likely in significant part because there were
calls for his resignation and it would have set a terrible precedent.
6.
Pope Benedict may follow the pattern of
previously resigned popes and spend the rest of his days in a monastery.
7.
The fact that Pope Benedict chose to do
this now, just before Lent begins, so that his resignation takes place in two
weeks and we should have a new pope before Easter, means that his deterioration
of health is serious.
8.
The Pope is 85 years old, and thanks to
advancing medical technology means increasingly long lifespans with a
longer period of frail health. It is not easy
to be 85 or 90 or 95 and feel confident steering the ship of Peter in today’s
world.
9.
I pray that the rest of the world will accept
his decision and respect him. So often will the media and pop culture today
(run by the Devil) will serve to rebuke him and take advantage of poking fun of
the Church in this time of finding a new Pope.
Let us pray for our dear Holy Father and for God’s guidance
on the conclave who will elect our new Pope.
Quid est veritas?
It was a long time
ago when I first came into my parents bedroom and asked my Dad, "When
did God make the dinosaurs?" My Dad answered me by telling me to go get
my Bible and we would find out. Yet no where in Genesis does it tell how
God made the Earth, then the dinosaurs, then destroyed them all with an
asteroid and then made us... or at least made the apes that became us.
It didn't make sense. According to the Bible, the Earth was made in 7
days and there was no talk of a prehistoric time when dinosaurs ruled
the Earth. In fact it seemed to me that man had ruled the Earth from the
beginning?
As time moved on I basically came to this conclusion after being taught in school about evolution and everything, that it all went hand in hand with the story of creation. When the "big bang" happened, that was God saying, "Let there be light!" Yet still some parts of evolution didn't fit with the whole story of creation? I mean... what about apes becoming cavemen? What about dinosaurs... and where exactly did this terrible asteroid hit the Earth? Can we go see tours of it today? Do they have a gift shop?
Something still wasn't making sense to me. If God made the Earth, and Evolution happened all at the same time... then someone forgot to write about that in the Bible. And for a long time that's what I began to believe. And if you would have asked me I would have told you back then that the stories of the Bible in Genesis and even the story of Noah was fiction. Fictional stories made up by the early Hebrews who wrote the Old Testament to give a primitive explanation as to how our God made us all. And due to the times, and the lack of scientific knowledge... the whole creation story was more of a summarized version of what we know now about evolution.
WHAT? What was I thinking?? I was beginning to sound like Martin Luther! "Since this part of the Bible doesn't go with my way of thinking... let's take it out!" AHHH!!! No, no, no... this can't be the answer! This is not the truth! So then... what is? Was there really once an Adam and Eve?? As I soon found out, according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Adam and Eve were real in respect to the fact that Jesus is the New Adam and the Blessed Virgin Mary is the New Eve! Whoa... this really messes things up for evolution! In fact, even according to science as I soon learned, all of our DNA can all be traced back to 2 people who lived in Africa. Did anyone know this? Why was I not informed about this? They did exist!! And what about Noah and the flood? Well all over the world there have been searches for Noah's Ark, and there are many claims as to where it is... but nothing proven yet, as far as I know. But there is one thing that is interesting... certain fossils of fish and other sea creatures have been found on the tops of mountains. MOUNTAINS?? You mean those big tall hills that are way WAY above sea level??? How did fish get up there?? Maybe there was a flood? And maybe the great flood was caused by the contents separating across the Earth!?
"Well by-George, I think he's got it!"
Okay, so no apes, no asteroids... and all fossils were formed by the great flood? Well then what about my first question... where did the dinosaurs come from? I mean, you go to a museum and they have all their bones there. And there are paleontologists all over the world finding these creatures! So when did God make them... or have I totally lost it and really the first explanation of evolution really defines everything we need to know?
I dunno, maybe I am crazy! Maybe these are just stories that the Hebrews wrote to show us the great power of God. Even Jesus told us parables on how to love our neighbor? I mean... come on, we even have a St. George who battled a dragon in the middle ages... there's no such thing as dragons... right?
I was soon answered this question when I was told that there are many saints that after Vatican II were believed to be made up. Even churches that had these saint names were even renamed, like St. Philomena's here in Omaha is now St. Francis Cabrini. What's going on here? Were there actually some saints that were made up?
Um... no! Of course not, every saint known to man had to be canonized by the Catholic Church, which has always been a long process that is based on the miracles that occur after the holy person has died. So then what about St. George and his dragon... was that just made up, even though there was a St. George? When I later posed this question to my Pastor, he responded by telling me... "Well Dan, there is some evidence out there that suggests that there were dragons at that time."
Evidence? What evidence?? I wanna see!!! Sure enough there is a bunch of evidence on this. Just do a search on "Dinosaurs or Dragons" on Google and there is a bunch of information on this! A lot of information that suggests that dinosaurs and dragons are one and the same. In fact it was Sir Richard Owen of England who came up with the name "dinosaur" in 1841. Before that, all big lizard creatures were called dragons. And if we begin to research this we find that there are stories of dragons all over the world. And in every part of the world, the dragon is described in the same way. In fact even the Chinese calendar includes the year of the dragon as a equal animal to all the other animals in the calendar. Also as I discovered, there are artifacts all over the world depicting dinosaurs. For example: deep in the jungles of Cambodia are ornate temples and palaces from the Khmer civilization. One such temple, Ta Prohm abounds with stone statues and reliefs. Almost every square inch of the gray sandstone is covered with ornate, detailed carvings. These depict familiar animals like monkeys, deer, water buffalo, parrots, and lizards. However, one column contains an intricate carving of a stegosaur-like creature. But how could artisans decorating an 800 year old Buddhist temple know what a dinosaur looked like? Western science only began assembling dinosaurs skeletons in the past two centuries. They had to have seen it! Suddenly St. George's dragon was beginning to sound more and more like a dinosaur than a mythological dragon!
In discovering this, I was beginning to see that there was definitely something going on here. Somebody was trying to make us all believe something about our history in this world, and that somebody was lying... BIG TIME!! But who? What?
Enter stage left: Charles Darwin and the Theory of Evolution!
It's thanks to Charles Darwin and his Theory of Evolution that scientists have pushed this radical idea that we all came about in this way. The only problem is that any scientist who believes these theories, can't prove what came before... what made the single cell organism that started the seed of life. And if you watch Ben Stein's movie "Expelled" you will see what damage they are truly causing in this world. And what more damage it could cause and even has caused to this world. The idea that evolution is true and that our only purpose in life is to live and die and that natural selection helps to keep the balance of things, opens up the doors to things such as eugenics, abortion, euthanasia, contraception and etc. Ideas that were once imposed by such governments like Nazi Germany. Ideas that pushed out things like religion and belief in God.
Quid est veritas? (What is truth?) Be careful who you ask... because according to Our Lord Jesus, "Every one that is of the truth, heareth my voice." John 18:37 Therefore I would trust my Bible over any atheist scientist who is ignoring certain questions that have great validity to their query!
I would love to discuss this topic more with anyone! It's a topic that has truly fascinated me lately! And if you have a chance I recommend you check out the movies "Expelled" by Ben Stine and also "Dragons or Dinosaurs". You will learn a lot!
http://www.amazon.com/Expelled-Intelligence-Allowed-Ben-Stein/dp/B001BYLFFS
http://www.amazon.com/Dragons-Or-Dinosaurs-Creation-Evolution/dp/B0033HKDX6
As time moved on I basically came to this conclusion after being taught in school about evolution and everything, that it all went hand in hand with the story of creation. When the "big bang" happened, that was God saying, "Let there be light!" Yet still some parts of evolution didn't fit with the whole story of creation? I mean... what about apes becoming cavemen? What about dinosaurs... and where exactly did this terrible asteroid hit the Earth? Can we go see tours of it today? Do they have a gift shop?
Something still wasn't making sense to me. If God made the Earth, and Evolution happened all at the same time... then someone forgot to write about that in the Bible. And for a long time that's what I began to believe. And if you would have asked me I would have told you back then that the stories of the Bible in Genesis and even the story of Noah was fiction. Fictional stories made up by the early Hebrews who wrote the Old Testament to give a primitive explanation as to how our God made us all. And due to the times, and the lack of scientific knowledge... the whole creation story was more of a summarized version of what we know now about evolution.
WHAT? What was I thinking?? I was beginning to sound like Martin Luther! "Since this part of the Bible doesn't go with my way of thinking... let's take it out!" AHHH!!! No, no, no... this can't be the answer! This is not the truth! So then... what is? Was there really once an Adam and Eve?? As I soon found out, according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Adam and Eve were real in respect to the fact that Jesus is the New Adam and the Blessed Virgin Mary is the New Eve! Whoa... this really messes things up for evolution! In fact, even according to science as I soon learned, all of our DNA can all be traced back to 2 people who lived in Africa. Did anyone know this? Why was I not informed about this? They did exist!! And what about Noah and the flood? Well all over the world there have been searches for Noah's Ark, and there are many claims as to where it is... but nothing proven yet, as far as I know. But there is one thing that is interesting... certain fossils of fish and other sea creatures have been found on the tops of mountains. MOUNTAINS?? You mean those big tall hills that are way WAY above sea level??? How did fish get up there?? Maybe there was a flood? And maybe the great flood was caused by the contents separating across the Earth!?
"Well by-George, I think he's got it!"
Okay, so no apes, no asteroids... and all fossils were formed by the great flood? Well then what about my first question... where did the dinosaurs come from? I mean, you go to a museum and they have all their bones there. And there are paleontologists all over the world finding these creatures! So when did God make them... or have I totally lost it and really the first explanation of evolution really defines everything we need to know?
I dunno, maybe I am crazy! Maybe these are just stories that the Hebrews wrote to show us the great power of God. Even Jesus told us parables on how to love our neighbor? I mean... come on, we even have a St. George who battled a dragon in the middle ages... there's no such thing as dragons... right?
I was soon answered this question when I was told that there are many saints that after Vatican II were believed to be made up. Even churches that had these saint names were even renamed, like St. Philomena's here in Omaha is now St. Francis Cabrini. What's going on here? Were there actually some saints that were made up?
Um... no! Of course not, every saint known to man had to be canonized by the Catholic Church, which has always been a long process that is based on the miracles that occur after the holy person has died. So then what about St. George and his dragon... was that just made up, even though there was a St. George? When I later posed this question to my Pastor, he responded by telling me... "Well Dan, there is some evidence out there that suggests that there were dragons at that time."
Evidence? What evidence?? I wanna see!!! Sure enough there is a bunch of evidence on this. Just do a search on "Dinosaurs or Dragons" on Google and there is a bunch of information on this! A lot of information that suggests that dinosaurs and dragons are one and the same. In fact it was Sir Richard Owen of England who came up with the name "dinosaur" in 1841. Before that, all big lizard creatures were called dragons. And if we begin to research this we find that there are stories of dragons all over the world. And in every part of the world, the dragon is described in the same way. In fact even the Chinese calendar includes the year of the dragon as a equal animal to all the other animals in the calendar. Also as I discovered, there are artifacts all over the world depicting dinosaurs. For example: deep in the jungles of Cambodia are ornate temples and palaces from the Khmer civilization. One such temple, Ta Prohm abounds with stone statues and reliefs. Almost every square inch of the gray sandstone is covered with ornate, detailed carvings. These depict familiar animals like monkeys, deer, water buffalo, parrots, and lizards. However, one column contains an intricate carving of a stegosaur-like creature. But how could artisans decorating an 800 year old Buddhist temple know what a dinosaur looked like? Western science only began assembling dinosaurs skeletons in the past two centuries. They had to have seen it! Suddenly St. George's dragon was beginning to sound more and more like a dinosaur than a mythological dragon!
In discovering this, I was beginning to see that there was definitely something going on here. Somebody was trying to make us all believe something about our history in this world, and that somebody was lying... BIG TIME!! But who? What?
Enter stage left: Charles Darwin and the Theory of Evolution!
It's thanks to Charles Darwin and his Theory of Evolution that scientists have pushed this radical idea that we all came about in this way. The only problem is that any scientist who believes these theories, can't prove what came before... what made the single cell organism that started the seed of life. And if you watch Ben Stein's movie "Expelled" you will see what damage they are truly causing in this world. And what more damage it could cause and even has caused to this world. The idea that evolution is true and that our only purpose in life is to live and die and that natural selection helps to keep the balance of things, opens up the doors to things such as eugenics, abortion, euthanasia, contraception and etc. Ideas that were once imposed by such governments like Nazi Germany. Ideas that pushed out things like religion and belief in God.
Quid est veritas? (What is truth?) Be careful who you ask... because according to Our Lord Jesus, "Every one that is of the truth, heareth my voice." John 18:37 Therefore I would trust my Bible over any atheist scientist who is ignoring certain questions that have great validity to their query!
I would love to discuss this topic more with anyone! It's a topic that has truly fascinated me lately! And if you have a chance I recommend you check out the movies "Expelled" by Ben Stine and also "Dragons or Dinosaurs". You will learn a lot!
http://www.amazon.com/Expelled-Intelligence-Allowed-Ben-Stein/dp/B001BYLFFS
http://www.amazon.com/Dragons-Or-Dinosaurs-Creation-Evolution/dp/B0033HKDX6
Welcome!
Today I am launching "The Catholic Vita" blog, which is a site for me to discuss Catholic apologetics, news and other topics on the faith. I hope you all will enjoy it, and be informed. This is also a spiritual journal for me as I go about my spiritual journey in life.
Along my life I have learned many fun and fascinating things about our Catholic faith and this world that we live in, and the more I learn, the more I want to share with others. The truth can not be hidden! And beauty and richness of the Catholic faith is addicting! I love being a Catholic and I love Our Lord Jesus!! And this is my way of showing my love for Him and His bride the Church.
God love you all!
Dan
Along my life I have learned many fun and fascinating things about our Catholic faith and this world that we live in, and the more I learn, the more I want to share with others. The truth can not be hidden! And beauty and richness of the Catholic faith is addicting! I love being a Catholic and I love Our Lord Jesus!! And this is my way of showing my love for Him and His bride the Church.
God love you all!
Dan
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)