data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73537/73537c13f5c228bc8f9876c2955b4044530b1712" alt=""
Rosemarie Smead is one of about 150 women around the world who have decided not to wait for the Roman Catholic Church to lift its ban on women priests, but to be ordained and start their own congregations.
In an interview before the ceremony, Smead said she is not worried about being excommunicated from the Church — the fate of other women ordained outside of Vatican law.
"It has no sting for me," said Smead, a petite, gray-haired former Carmelite nun with a ready hug for strangers. "It is a Medieval bullying stick the bishops used to keep control over people and to keep the voices of women silent. I am way beyond letting octogenarian men tell us how to live our lives."
To read the full article, Click Here.
Sigh… Last week I came across this article on Facebook and I couldn't stop shaking my head. This is very sad. As I had written in a previous article on the Catholic Vita, I honestly can't believe this still exists, especially after Blessed John Paul II's infallible statement in his 1994 Apostolic Letter: Ordinatio Sacerdotalis. Yet there still exists women like these who wish to defy Rome. Very sad.
Here are my comments on the points made in this article. First and foremost, the comment that these women are not waiting "for the Roman Catholic Church to lift its ban on women priests" is completely misguided. There is no so-called "ban" on women priests. Thus would suggest that it was once allowed and now has been banned, which is on the contrary. As the late Holy Father made it clear, the Church herself "has no power to ordain women", therefore throughout all it's history has kept with this tradition set forth by Jesus Himself. Even though this argument is often countered with the idea that Jesus didn't ordain women as priests because of the times, which as I stated previously is a very lame and uneducated statement! We know that Jesus did many things that went against the times and norms of the culture He lived in, and therefore to say such a thing is really preposterous! The Church throughout all time has never once ordained a woman and never will. It's not a "ban" that can be lifted… Its just the way it is because that's how it was set up.
In the second point they state that there were once women priests, deacons and bishops. Again… This is not true. There were such things as women deaconesses, yet they were not ordained. Rather the women "deaconesses" were rather appointed during the time in cases where the sacrament of Baptism or Extreme Unction were to be carried out to an woman who may have been in an indecent condition for a male priest or deacon to minister to.
Council of Nicaea I:
"Similarly, in regard to the deaconesses, as with all who are enrolled in the register, the same procedure is to be observed. We have made mention of the deaconesses, who have been enrolled in this position, although, not having been in any way ordained, they are certainly to be numbered among the laity" (Canon 19 [A.D. 325]).
Epiphanius of Salamis:
"It is true that in the Church there is an order of deaconesses, but not for being a priestess, nor for any kind of work of administration, but for the sake of the dignity of the female sex, either at the time of baptism or of examining the sick or suffering, so that the naked body of a female may not be seen by men administering sacred rites, but by the deaconess" (ibid.).
So there you have it, once again this argument is debunked. Yet sadly, there are those 150 women "priests" out there that don't believe it nor accept it. One would only pray that they would look to St. Mary Magdalene, and turn away from this sinful heresy and follow Christ as she did.
God love you all! Pray the rosary daily!
No comments:
Post a Comment